Saying they don't matter doesn't even make sense. OK, let's break this down: I'm going to put it in italics to make it stand out. 600 points of damage+heal+2 other effects, does way more than other level 1 skills of other demigods.Įrebus is already powerful enough even after the nerf, as he has 2 ways to escape otherwise certain death, and an effective stun. No stats to back the nerf up? Bite is an ability with a low cost, low recharge, no cast time that did 300 life drain + snare + armor debuff at level 1 allowing your next few attacks to hit for more damage. Not to mention the abundance of bad players who probably decided to play him after hearing he's overpowered. I'm pretty sure AI is still in pantheon because I just played a pantheon match with 2v2 with 1 team having an AI. Pantheon stats don't matter, they're probably broken, and for all we know, it might even include AI in it. Class distribution in WoW reflects more than just players interested in PvP, at least that is what i'll assume from the link you gave supporting your arguement (there was none). "The context is important" applies to your own post as well, in which you compare an MMORPG that features PvE and PvP with a persistant world to a non-persistant, deathmatch style game that features no PvE play. If they did, then it would mean Hunters in World of Warcraft were kings of everything for the first two years and Shaman never had any advantage in the early days of PvP, but it's widely accepted that Hunters were over-used by gold-farmers and Shaman was a problem until the autumn of 2005. Pantheon statistics do not tell you which DGs are the most efficient. For example, define "low", lower than other abilites? which abilites? "way more than other level 1 skills", how much more is "way more"? which skills? how do they relate to bite? It is your responsibility to inform these claims, and please be less vague in the future. In the second paragraph I italicised sections and words that you need to support. I edited the first paragraph of your post with underlines to bring attention to how many assumptions you are making here, and that you did not give us any support for them.
0 kommentar(er)
